LoudFact is a women-first editorial site for everyday questions about beauty, health, relationships, money, work, shopping and life. Our aim is useful context, clear language and room for different experiences.
Useful, considered guidance
Our editorial standards favour practical explanations over exaggerated promises. A personal experience is not a universal rule, a product claim is not independent evidence, and an emerging finding is not settled science. Those distinctions should be clear in our stories.
Sources and accountability
Factual claims should be supported by relevant, traceable sources. For research, safety information and technical specifications, we prioritise original studies, public authorities and official documentation. Authors and publication dates appear on article pages. We do not present an author as a qualified professional unless those credentials have been established.
Health, money and other personal decisions
Our content provides general information, not individual medical, financial or legal advice. We aim to explain limitations and uncertainty, and encourage readers to consult an appropriately qualified professional when making decisions about their own circumstances.
Shopping and recommendations
A research-based buying guide should be identified through its descriptions and evidence. We do not describe a product as personally tested unless it has been tested. Prices, availability and specifications can change; readers should confirm important details with the seller. Advertising and affiliate relationships should be disclosed clearly.
Commercial independence
Advertisements and sponsored material must be distinguishable from editorial content. An affiliate commission is not a reason to describe an unsuitable product as a good choice. See our affiliate disclosure.
Tools and editorial responsibility
Research, writing and editing tools, including AI-assisted tools, do not replace responsibility for published claims. Generated text is not itself evidence. Sources, quotations, product details and factual assertions require verification before they are relied upon.
Updates and corrections
Older stories remain in our archive while we develop the women-first direction. Some use earlier section names or formats. Publication and modification dates alone do not establish that every detail remains current. We correct confirmed factual errors and explain significant changes where appropriate. Read our corrections policy.
Tell us what needs attention
Use our contact form to raise a factual concern, suggest a topic or ask about our standards. Include the article link and supporting sources when reporting an error.